The New York Times says that Congress included about $100 billion for education in the stimulus law last year. The idea was to cushion the recession’s impact on schools and to help fuel an economic recovery. That money will run out by the end of this school term.
What does that mean? State and local tax revenues are still in decline. The end of the federal money will leave big holes in education budgets across the nation. Golly gee.
“States are going to face a huge problem because they’ll have to find some way to replace these billions, either with cuts to their K-12 systems or by finding alternative revenues,” said Bruce Baker, an education professor at Rutgers University.
Ah, Bruce? Alternate revenues? You mean higher taxes to fund bloated budgets, smaller class sizes and teacher aides? Some of us think not. One local elementary school that we know capped class sizes at 12 students some years back. That’s less than half the number that teachers from a generation ago sometimes dealt with.
Can we afford that sort of thing? No, we cannot. We have exhausted the federal budget, exhausted local taxpayers and achieved no significant better teaching results.
It’s past time to stop thinking that taxation is a solution. Cutting budgets and working harder to get the job done is a more rational approach. No more business as usual, protected jobs
Get on with it.